If you haven't been following the ID story because you haven't wanted to do the digging to get the straight scoop on intelligent design, this introductory article seems very even-handed. (Score one for the paper-and-ink media.)
Finding even-handedness really seems to be the problem in this whole controversy. Everyone you read seems to be partisan. (I have my suspicions as to who is right, but there's a big empty area of my mental desk marked "put new data here as it comes in".)
(No cracks about other big empty areas of my mental desk.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
No, "even-handedness" is not the problem. The problem is that a particular group of people are trying to teach their interpretation of the early parts of Genesis in public schools.
Post a Comment